Not financial advice. Not intended for UK audiences. Not regulated by the FCA. For educational purposes only.

Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy)

$84 Billion. Ponzi or Bitcoin Machine?

One company turned itself into a machine that converts your money into Bitcoin. Here's exactly how it works, what could kill it, and whether the people calling it a ponzi are right.

761,068
BTC held
$1B+/yr
Fixed obligations
1.8%
BTC return to break even
$84B
Total planned raises

↓ Scroll to start

The Capital Funnel

Five different products. Five different investor types. One output: Bitcoin.

👴
Retiree
Wants monthly income
STRC11.5% monthly
🏢
Bond Fund
Wants fixed rate
STRF10% fixed
📈
Growth Investor
Wants BTC leverage
MSTRCommon stock
🇪🇺
European
Wants euros
STRE10% in EUR
⚖️
Hybrid
Income + upside
STRK8% + converts
Bitcoin
Net proceeds used to accumulate BTC
Every product targets a different investor. Every product serves the same purpose: raise capital to buy Bitcoin. A portion is set aside as a dividend reserve ($2.25B so far), but the primary use of proceeds is BTC accumulation.

Permanent Capital

The single most important thing about every preferred stock Strategy has issued.

Normal Bond

$100
IN
$100
BACK
Coupon
Coupon
Coupon
Coupon
Lender gets their $100 back at maturity

Strategy Preferred (STRC, STRF, etc.)

$100
IN
Dividend
Dividend
Dividend
Forever...
Strategy never pays the $100 back. Ever.
Want out? Sell your shares on the market.

$6.4B raised through preferred stocks.

$0 of it ever needs to be returned.

The only hard debt with a maturity date: $6.3B in convertible notes (due 2028 to 2032).

One exception worth knowing: STRD is non-cumulative. If Strategy misses a dividend, it's gone. They don't owe it later. Every other preferred stock accumulates what's owed. STRD doesn't. That's Saylor's pressure valve in a crisis.

The $100 Switch

STRC above $100 = machine on. Below $100 = machine off. Saylor hikes the rate until buyers come back.

>$100
MACHINE ON
ATM prints new STRC shares at $100+. Every share sold = BTC buying power.
<$100
MACHINE OFF
ATM stops. Saylor hikes the dividend until income investors buy back in.

Five hikes in eight months. Every one because STRC dipped below $100.

10.5%
Oct '25
10.75%
Dec '25
11.0%
Jan '26
11.25%
Feb '26
11.5%
Mar '26

Where The Money Is

MSTR moves with Bitcoin. The preferred stocks are fixed income. Different games, different scales.

$46B
MSTR
Common Stock
~$138/share
All upside. All downside.
Absorbs first losses for everyone above.
Fixed Income (Preferred Stocks)
STRC
$3.4B
11.5% var
Fastest growing
STRD
$952M
10% non-cum
$4B authorized
STRF
$850M
10% fixed
Quarterly
STRE
$670M
10% fixed
EUR-denominated
STRK
$563M
8% converts
To MSTR
$6.4B total preferred
All perpetual. No principal repayment.

The 42/42 Plan

In October 2024 Saylor announced the "21/21 Plan": raise $42B to buy Bitcoin. Seven months later he doubled it. $84 billion. By end of 2027.

The structure

$42B

Equity

MSTR common stock ATM sales

+

$42B

Fixed Income

Preferred stocks + convertible notes

=

$84B

Total

All of it buys Bitcoin

Equity: MSTR Common Stock

~$25B of $42B (~60%)

~$25B raised

Original $21B ATM fully used. New $21B ATM filed May 2025. Sold via at-the-market offerings into daily trading volume.

Fixed Income: Preferred Stocks + Notes

~$15B of $42B (~36%)

~$15B raised

Convertible Notes

$8.2B

0-2.25%, due 2028-2032

STRC

$3.4B

11.5% variable, perpetual

STRD

$952M

10% non-cumulative

STRF

$850M

10% fixed, quarterly

STRE

$670M

10% in EUR

STRK

$563M

8% converts to MSTR

Total Progress

~$40B of $84B (48%)

Equity
Fixed
~$44B remaining

Started Oct 2024. Doubled May 2025. Deadline: end of 2027. Roughly halfway through with almost two years to go.

The STRC Amplifier

STRC volume doesn't just buy Bitcoin through STRC. It triggers a second, larger wave of MSTR selling. Both buy BTC.

STRC Daily Volume
$300M
Mar 10 record day
STRC ATM (~40%)
$120M
New shares issued above $100
+
MSTR ATM (~2x)
$240M
Common stock sold to balance leverage
Total BTC Bought
$360M
~5,100 BTC at $70K

$300M of STRC volume = $360M of Bitcoin bought

That's ~5,100 BTC in a single day. Daily mined supply is 450 BTC. Strategy is buying 11x what gets mined.

Why does MSTR selling follow STRC selling?

STRC = the loan (fixed payments). MSTR = the equity (no fixed payments). More loans = more equity needed to stay safe. Both buy BTC.

Mar 2-8: $377M STRC + $899M MSTR (~2.4x). Ratio shifts with market conditions.

The Model

Every dollar of preferred stock issued adds to the annual cost. Here's how the math changes as they scale.

New Preferred Issued Annual Cost Breakeven BTC Return At 5% BTC Return
Today ($0 new) $1B+/yr 1.8% +$1.64B surplus
+$2B $1.18B/yr 2.3% +$1.41B surplus
+$5B $1.52B/yr 2.9% +$1.06B surplus
+$10B $2.10B/yr 4.1% +$490M surplus
+$20B $3.25B/yr 6.3% -$660M deficit
Full $84B plan ~$2B+/yr ~3.9% +$590M surplus

If BTC does 10%/yr

+$4.2B

annual surplus (at today's cost)

If BTC does 0%/yr

-$1B+

reserve covers 28.5 months, then BTC gets sold

Model assumes new issuance at 11.5% (current STRC rate). Full $84B plan includes a mix of rates across instruments. BTC stack: 761,068 BTC at $70K = $57.6B. All figures approximate.

But Aren't MSTR Holders Getting Diluted?

Yes. Share count up ~79% in 2025. But dilution can be good, neutral, or bad. It depends on one number: mNAV.

🔍

What is mNAV?

The single number that tells you whether MSTR is cheap or expensive relative to its Bitcoin.

THE FORMULA

mNAV = MSTR Market Cap / Value of Bitcoin Held

1.5x

Stock trades at a 50% premium to the BTC it holds

1.0x

Stock trades at exactly the value of its BTC

0.7x

Stock is cheaper than just buying BTC directly

Right now, MSTR trades at roughly 1x mNAV (~$138/share). The BTC backing each share is worth about the same. That matters because it determines whether selling new shares helps or hurts existing holders.

mNAV > 1x (premium)

1

MSTR trades at $200 but is backed by $100 of BTC per share

2

Saylor sells new shares at $200, buys $200 of BTC

3

More shares exist, but BTC per share went up

Accretive dilution
You own a smaller slice of a bigger pie. Net positive.

mNAV = 1x (today)

1

MSTR trades at $138, backed by ~$138 of BTC per share

2

MSTR ATM is neutral. No gain, no loss for holders.

3

But preferred stocks raise capital without touching MSTR at all

Preferred stocks save the flywheel
STRK, STRF, STRD, STRE, STRC all buy BTC without diluting MSTR holders.

mNAV < 1x (discount)

1

MSTR trades below the value of its BTC holdings

2

Selling new shares buys less BTC than the dilution costs

3

BTC per share goes down. Existing holders lose.

Destructive dilution
Saylor promised not to issue below 2.5x mNAV. He broke that promise.

BTC Yield by Year (% change in BTC per diluted share)

Sometimes they gain. Sometimes they lose. But the trend is clear.

+47.3%
2021
+1.8%
2022
+7.3%
2023
+74.3%
2024
+22.8%
2025

BTC Yield = % change in BTC per diluted share. Is each MSTR share backed by more Bitcoin? Every year positive, but 2022 and 2023 barely above zero.

Sources: Strategy Q4 2024 & Q4 2025 earnings, CNBC, FinanceFeeds

Before preferred stocks

1.0x

MSTR ATM was the only tool. Below par = game over.

With preferred stocks

~0.7x

Preferred stocks buy BTC without MSTR dilution. The preferred leg offsets dilutive MSTR issuance.

Kill line depends on MSTR:preferred ratio. Mar 2026 8-K showed ~2.4x. Not a fixed rule.

Where It Breaks

If Bitcoin doesn't go up, the machine doesn't work. That's not a flaw. That's the design.

📈

BTC belief dies

Master risk. If nobody buys, the flywheel stops.

No STRC buyers = no ATM = no capital = no BTC purchases. Everything else is downstream of this single risk.

💰

$1B+/yr in obligations

$85M+ every month. Over $10B in preferred stock outstanding.

Dividends and interest don't stop whether BTC is at $100K or $30K. After the reserve runs out, Strategy sells Bitcoin.

📄

$6.3B in convertible notes

Due 2028-2032. All out of the money at ~$138.

Unlike preferred stocks, these actually mature. If MSTR stays below conversion prices, Strategy owes cash.

⚠️

The cost keeps growing

1.8% breakeven today. ~3.9% at full $84B plan.

Every new preferred issued raises the annual cost. STRC already hiked from 10.5% to 11.5% in eight months.

🏦

The bank run problem

STRC is liquid. Everyone can sell. But not everyone can exit at once.

~$3B of STRC trades at ~$100/share. If every holder wants their $100 back simultaneously, there is not enough liquidity for everyone to redeem. Same mechanics as a bank run. Works perfectly as long as inflows continue and exits stay orderly. If confidence breaks and everyone rushes the door at the same time, the price craters below par and the $100 "floor" disappears.

The only number that matters

1.8%

BTC needs to return 1.8% per year to cover every obligation.

761,068 BTC ($57.6B cost basis) backing $1B+/yr in obligations. The stack is ~57x the annual bill.

So: it could break. But the man running it has been here before.

Saylor's Track Record

He's changed his mind before. Whether that's adaptive or dishonest depends on your perspective.

March 2000 SEC settlement

Accounting restatement

Restated 3 years of revenue. Stock dropped 62% in one day. tap for more

Turned reported profits into losses. Saylor paid $8.3M to settle with the SEC without admitting fault.

Jan 2022 ➜ ongoing says one thing, files another

"We will never sell our Bitcoin"

On TV: never selling. In SEC filings: may sell at a loss. Then sold 704 BTC. tap for more

SEC filings state: "we may be required to sell bitcoin... at prices below our cost basis." In Dec 2022, they did exactly that.

Jul 2025 ➜ Aug 2025 broken in <30 days

"Won't dilute below 2.5x mNAV"

Promise made July. Broken August. Rewrote the policy. Still issuing at ~1x. tap for more

Rewrote policy to allow dilution "when otherwise deemed advantageous." MSTR now trades at ~1x mNAV.

The bull case: he adapts to survive. The bear case: he says whatever gets the next round done.

Sources: SEC LR-16829, Bloomberg Jan 2022, SEC 8-K Jan 6 + Apr 7 2025, Protos Aug 2025

Is Strategy a Ponzi?

"Ponzi" is a legal term. It means fraud. Let's be precise about what that word actually means.

What "Ponzi scheme" actually means

A Ponzi scheme is a crime. It requires deception: the operator lies about returns, hides the mechanics, and victims don't know what they're buying.

The mechanics? Yes.

Strategy does look like a ponzi if you only read the flow of money.

New money pays old investors

New STRC/MSTR buyers fund BTC purchases that support existing holders' NAV

Only works if BTC goes up

BTC flat = 1.8% annual drag. BTC down = obligations eat the stack.

Must keep issuing

$84B plan. If they stop issuing, the machine stops buying.

Leverage on a volatile asset

$1B+/yr in fixed obligations on an asset that dropped 77% in 2022

The fraud? No.

The difference between a crime and a financial strategy is one thing: transparency.

Nothing is hidden

Every issuance, every BTC purchase, every prospectus is filed with the SEC. Public record.

Everyone knows the mechanics

Saylor explains the model on earnings calls, podcasts, and Twitter. Investors buy knowing exactly what this is.

No fake returns

Madoff printed fake account statements. Strategy's BTC holdings are verified on-chain and in SEC filings.

You can leave any time

MSTR, STRK, STRF, STRD, STRE, STRC all trade on public exchanges. Madoff locked redemptions.

Strategy is a ponzi in every way except the one that matters.

Same mechanics: new money supports old money, needs BTC to go up, can't stop issuing. But a ponzi is a crime. It requires deception. Everyone buying knows exactly what this is.

The whole thing comes down to one question:

Does Bitcoin return more than 1.8% a year?

If yes, the machine prints forever. If no, the machine eats itself.

Whether that's a good bet depends entirely on what you think Bitcoin does next.

Built by @alessandrorisk